Disadvantages of using WebP format. Why we need to use WebP?

There are several drawbacks associated with the use of WebP, which are commonly discussed when considering the adoption of this format. Let's explore them in detail.

1. Browser Compatibility Issues:

While WebP is supported by most modern browsers, older versions of browsers, particularly Internet Explorer and Safari, do not support it. This can lead to compatibility issues for users on outdated systems.

2. Limited Offline Use:

WebP is primarily designed for web use, making it less useful for offline viewing or applications that do not support the format.

3. Potential Quality Loss:

WebP uses lossy compression, which can result in a reduction of image quality, especially at higher compression levels. This is a concern for applications requiring high fidelity, such as photography or graphic design.

4. Image Resolution Limitations:

WebP has a maximum image resolution limit of 16,383 x 16,383 pixels, which may not be sufficient for very high-resolution images, limiting its usability in certain contexts.

5. Limited Editing Software Support:

Although support has improved, not all image editing software natively supports WebP, which can complicate workflows for designers and photographers.

Here's our thought

Considering these disadvantages, it is crucial to address browser compatibility issues proactively. We can use "srcset" in html to specify the jpg format image as a fallback which can effectively manage compatibility concerns.

Use for web purpose wisely

Regarding offline usage, quality loss, and resolution limitations, it is essential to remember that WebP is primarily tailored for web content. Utilizing it for offline purposes at maximum quality or resolution might not be the most suitable choice.

While WebP is adept at delivering high-quality, high-resolution images for the web, editing images in their original formats like JPG or PNG is advisable. Generating a WebP output specifically for web usage can streamline the process and ensure optimal results.

In conclusion, despite its drawbacks, WebP remains a valuable format for providing superior image quality and resolution for web-based applications.